Appeared up some reference data, velocity and pressures looked pretty conservative. So Blindly bought 16#s, and sounds like I gained the gamble, seems like those who attempted it Feel its a good powder.
Add to quotation Only display this person #6 · Apr 14, 2024 (Edited) That could be because as to charge weights, pressures, and velocities it seems on initial glance to complete throughout the ballpark of anything like a 'Large Gun' type powder, Inspite of Hodgdon's burn off rate chart positioning it right beside Exclusive.
To get rolling, click on the hyperlink below to visit mymagnow.com and learn the way to accessibility your digital magazine.
Burn off amount chart has very little to practically nothing to try and do with effectiveness in a cartridge. A "bomb" take a look at is finished in a closed chamber to record stress .
You almost certainly are also tightly specifying (clicking a lot of range boxes) for your hull/primer/shot weight blend that Hodgdon didn't examination with 244 powder.
probably even under the powder's bare minimum stress. A great illustration of this is the 148gr LHBWC in a very 38 Exclusive loaded with 3.0gr of Bullseye. This really is Among the most precise revolver loads in the world but is usually a very dirty burner. Bullseye is a really rapid burning powder also includes a minimum force of 15K psi and because this load only creates about 10k psi, it's like capturing Dust.
Recognize I did not say "optimum velocity" since there are plenty of occasions when considerably less velocity is a lot more appealing. Just a slight transform in the powder's burn fee can make a notable variance in overall performance.
The writer determined all the primer flash holes had been noticeably more than sized, Hence growing the tension. I'm not saying which was the trigger in Farmer's instance. Somewhat there are many things which can influence strain Apart from the powder demand by itself. In Farmer's Winchester 244 powder reloading data case in point, it could be several points: as mentioned an in excess of dimension flash hole, a unfastened primer pocket, a deep seated bullet (either at loading or from setback), or possibly a variance in bullet body weight, or case potential. Or a mix of more than one on the mentioned things. Wolfe publishing developed a fascinating e-book titled Firearm Stress Components that give appealing reading on the topic. My copy is dated 1990 and was up-to-date in 2006 but has given that been discontinued. It is really out there on Amazon but outrageously priced.
I do not learn about the Winchester or S&B guide cost-free primers currently being available, but Fiocchi guide free are offered.
Powder companies don't love to hear issues regarding their brand of powders …. particularly when a brand new powder is released as a cleanse burner that can help minimize bore fouling.
That is an older thread, you might not receive a reaction, and could be reviving an outdated thread. Make sure you think about developing a new thread.
"Powder and ball will make your mind up the problem. The gun and bayonet will alone end The competition during which we've been engaged, and any of you who are unable to provide your minds to this method of changing the issue experienced much better retire in time."
The 244 powder certainly has a slower burn up fee. There are not numerous powders considerably faster than TG. Sorry for throwing that in how I did. Gotcha, many thanks.
Just goofing close to as well as exercise, it'd make you truly give full attention to getting the complete pattern onto the bird.
Do you think you're chronographing your loads or investigating a ebook which is using an extended barrel than you've for data. Its in essence a fresh enhanced 231, also I am guaranteed less costly . Takes up a lot less space than 231, IRRC probably about similar to tightgroup.